Sex, Science, and Stem Cells | 
 enlarge | Author: Diana Degette
Publisher: The Lyons Press
Category: Book
List Price: $24.95
Buy New: $3.43
You Save: $21.52 (86%)
New (52) Used (16) Collectible (2) from $2.65
Rating:  7 reviews
Sales Rank: 98037
Media: Hardcover
Pages: 272
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.1 x 1.2
ISBN: 1599214318
Dewey Decimal Number: 616.027740973
EAN: 9781599214313
ASIN: 1599214318
Publication Date: August 4, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
DIVP style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"In August 2001, President George W. Bush announced with fanfare that federal funds would be made available to scientists conducting research on human embryonic stem cell lines#8212;with restrictions. Reading his words, not his lips, was Congresswoman Diana DeGette of Colorado#8217;s First Congressional District, and what she read was this: a Iban/I. #8220;As a practical matter,#8221; scientists could no longer pursue such work #8220;in any lab that had received any federal funding, at any time, for any reason. That one declaration severely constrained stem-cell research in this country.#8221; /PP style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" /PP style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"InI BSex, Science, and Stem Cells/B/I, Congress#8217;s leading advocate of stem-cell research presents a blistering indictment of the politicization of science#8212;and sex#8212;by the Bush administration, the Republican leadership, and the religious right. Addressing not only stem-cell research but also birth control, HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns, abortion, and sex education, Congresswoman DeGette takes the Bush White House and its fundamentalist allies to task for subverting any real discussion of human sexuality and reproduction. /PP style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" /PP style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"DeGette writes from experience#8212;and hard-earned frustration. During fifteen years in office, her fight for sound public policy for ethical, cutting-edge scientific research has consistently been foiled. Pulling no punches in her scrutiny of a Republican leadership that has long shirked matters relating even remotely to human sexuality, she concludes that many of America#8217;s elected officials are simply too blinded by religious dogma to think rationally about sex. In BISex, Science, and Stem Cells/I/B, she dares to do what they can#8217;t, or won#8217;t#8212;opening the door to responsible, fact-based legislation going forward. /P/DIV
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 2 more reviews...
 Waste of time November 20, 2008
Kim Shaftner MD (East Coast USA)
The book contains so many gross scientific inaccuracies that it doesn't pass muster. Although she sanctimoniously condemns conservatives for being duplicitous and anti-science, she has used her position and authority to produce a tome whose assertions about stem cell research are either terribly ill-informed or monstrous hypocrisy. Perhaps it should be better classified as fiction. br / br /For a more expansive assessment, read Yuval Levin's "Blinded by Science" article in the August (2008) online version of National Review.
 A great read for those who seek to best understand the Bush Administration's religious policies November 10, 2008
Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA)
Stem Cell research can bring many benefits to humanity, but many stand against it for religious reasons, including the Bush Administration. "Sex, Science, and Stem Cells: Inside the Right Wing Assault on Reason" is an argument that the right wing of American Politics is blinded by religion and is therefore preventing reason and medical science's advance through lack of support and wrongful bans. DeGette has been involved in Congress for more than fifteen years, and makes her case and tells her story of frustration. "Sex, Science, Stem Cells" is a great read for those who seek to best understand the Bush Administration's religious policies.
Stem Cell Research October 11, 2008
Joseph S. Maresca (Bronxville, New York USA)
The book has a good development of the current status br /of stem cell research, the problems and opportunities br /available as we move forward. In December, 1994, br /an Executive Order set boundaries on creating human br /embryos. According to Harriet Rabb-General Counsel, br /stem cells aren't within the statutory exclusionary br /definition of an embroyo. br / br /Scientists can create plurpotent cells which are br /scientifically engineered stem cells for diabetes patients. br /President George Bush discussed new treatments with br /moral boundaries aimed at keeping the research on br /ethical and moral high ground. The idea of cloning br /raises red flags . br / br /This is an excellent volume for readers interested br /in stem cell issues and current research.
 A Political Memoir and a Political Rant October 7, 2008
Jeffrey Beall (Denver, CO United States)
Diana DeGette is my congresswoman, so I felt motivated to buy and read her book. I wanted to understand her views on stem cell research, and I wanted to learn more about her as a person and a politician. br / br /This is a very emotional book. Representative DeGette is frustrated, angry, and embarrassed. She's frustrated with anyone who doesn't agree with her "common sense" views on anything related to human sexuality and reproduction, she's angry at the religious right for all the victories they have achieved against her, and she's embarrassed that her country is not like liberal Western Europe, where most women are on the pill, and people engage in free love and have abortions all the time and no one is the least bit bothered by it. br / br /So, it's an emotional book, but it's also a very personal book, and this is perhaps the book's saving grace. This isn't so much a book about government policies relating to embryonic stem cell research; it's really a book about Diana DeGette. It's a memoir. Here is the story of a gifted and talented woman who worked her way through college and law school, built a law practice, and then took a risk and entered politics. This book will interest anyone studying the late-20th century politics and government of Denver and Colorado, a political history that DeGette helped create. br / br /Readers will find a big disconnect between the introduction and the rest of the book. The introduction is strident and desultory; the balance of the book is measured and coherent. I think Diana DeGette wrote the introduction herself and Daniel Paisner, her credited ghostwriter, wrote the rest. Still, the entire work effectively conveys DeGette's overwhelming frustration with people who think differently than her. I think she wants her political legacy to be that of a hero for women's causes, but Catholics and other annoying "anti-choice" types keep getting in her way. br / br /Other reviewers have already pointed out that the book presents figures and research findings without proper citations or attribution, and this is true but not a major flaw. For me personally, the book's major disconnect relates to research in general. DeGette consistently portrays herself as a proponent of embryonic stem cell research, and she effectively lists and explains the importance and value of such research. But is she really a research proponent? I work at the only public university in her district, and I don't know of a single thing she's done to support research at this university or research anywhere of any kind except government-funded stem cell research. So she's not really a supporter of research, judging by her lack of support for research in Denver at least. br / br /In the end, DeGette's book is a pretty good, ghostwritten memoir, a political rant, and a case study of feminist political activism br /
To be honest I was horrified September 17, 2008
Tim Barrie (Sandy, Utah United States)
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I could not put this book down. I found this work by Diana DeGette to be an excellent, clearly written easy to read view of specific aspects of the workings of Congress and the Senate. In particular Diana DeGette provides the reader with a solid insight to the realities and challenges associated with passing legislation and driving intelligent discussion using facts and logic within government circles. In so doing she exposes the extent to which these processes are hampered by opinion driven and uninformed personal world views. Also she demonstrates through easy to follow examples, the extent to which extremist special interest groups hamper changes which the average rational person will see as purely benevolent. br / br /No doubt her specific subject matter will be controversial particularly in the U.S. as she focuses on sex and reproductive issues. Her approach however, is reason and fact based and oriented to achieving changes for the greater good. To be honest I was horrified to learn the extent to which America and indirectly the rest of the world is manipulated by a relative small number of people and organizations who have at the top of their priorities imposing their personal values on the rest of us and here's the thing, they do this regardless of what the facts show and the extent to which their views negatively impact the lives of literally millions of people. br / br /Diana DeGette's approach is to narrate a personal journey describing the surprising impact her professional accomplishments have made on her personal life, how she has dealt with them and with some of "life's curve balls" specifically when her daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and the impact that made to her motivations. br / br /If you consider yourself a rational person, i.e. someone who can be swayed by facts. br /If you want to learn more about what really goes on in congress and the process of creating bills for improving peoples lives. br /If you would like a solid insight into the biases of Congress people, Senators and the even The President. br /If you are generally interested in the specific subject matter, birth control, abortion, HIV/AIDS, sex education, religion and government. br /Then this book is for you. br / br /If you have already made up your mind. br /If you are not interested in facts and the result of scientific studies if they do not support your established opinions. br /If you are interested in the welfare of people only if you can also control their world view, religion and or and the way they choose to live their lives. br /Then this book in not for you.
|
|
|
