Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior | 
 enlarge | Author: Lawrence Baum
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Category: Book
List Price: $22.95
Buy New: $14.50
You Save: $8.45 (37%)
New (20) Used (4) from $14.50
Rating:  2 reviews
Sales Rank: 1079843
Media: Paperback
Pages: 256
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.1 x 0.7
ISBN: 0691138273
Dewey Decimal Number: 340
EAN: 9780691138275
ASIN: 0691138273
Publication Date: August 3, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: new Princeton Univ. Press 2008 paperback - clean, tight, and unmarked - ready to ship
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
pWhat motivates judges as decision makers? Political scientist Lawrence Baum offers a new perspective on this crucial question, a perspective based on judges' interest in the approval of audiences important to them./ppThe conventional scholarly wisdom holds that judges on higher courts seek only to make good law, good policy, or both. In these theories, judges are influenced by other people only in limited ways, in consequence of their legal and policy goals. In contrast, Baum argues that the influence of judges' audiences is pervasive. This influence derives from judges' interest in popularity and respect, a motivation central to most people. Judges care about the regard of audiences because they like that regard in itself, not just as a means to other ends. iJudges and Their Audiences/i uses research in social psychology to make the case that audiences shape judges' choices in substantial ways. Drawing on a broad range of scholarship on judicial decision-making and an array of empirical evidence, the book then analyzes the potential and actual impact of several audiences, including the public, other branches of government, court colleagues, the legal profession, and judges' social peers./ppEngagingly written, this book provides a deeper understanding of key issues concerning judicial behavior on which scholars disagree, identifies aspects of judicial behavior that diverge from the assumptions of existing models, and shows how those models can be strengthened./p
|
| Customer Reviews:
Judging those who Judge Judges November 9, 2006
Emmett Macfarlane (Kingston, ON Canada)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Finally a book that seeks to escape the narrow paradigm that has seemed to have trapped scholars of judicial behavior. Lawrence Baum's impressive account of judges' audiences as an influence on their decision-making is refreshing as it departs from the intuitive but overstated theory of judges as "single-minded seekers of policy". Baum's book provides a thoughtful, comprehensive and more realistic examination of the multiple motivations of judges...
A Fine Addition to the Literature on Judicial Behavior September 12, 2006
Ronald H. Clark (WASHINGTON, DC USA)
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Professor Baum has added another important book to the literature on judicial behavior in this interesting volume. Building upon some themes in his influential "The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior" (1997), his intent is to suggest in this exploratory study an additional perspective on judges. First, he succinctly reviews the major models used to study judicial behavior--attitudinal, strategic and legal. He suggests that students of the judiciary also would have much to gain by focusing upon the audiences judges seek to impress. Moreover, judges seek to impress these "salient" audiences not only for strategic reasons (such as promotion or to enhance their influence among colleagues), but because they covent the esteem of these groups for its own sake. An interesting chapter discusses judging as self-presentation, including some useful concepts from social psychology. The remaining chapters target particular audiences: colleagues, the public, other branches, social and professional groups, "policy groups" such as the Federalist Society, and the news media. His discussion of the so-called "Greenhouse effect" whereby judges become integrated into the liberal Washington social set (i.e., the Georgetown crew) is interesting, but lacks persuasive support, especially given the Washington Post's recent assertion that McLean, Virginia is the new power center, and it isn't inhabited by liberals to be sure. Baum recognizes that he lacks much data to support this approach since studies employing it have not been undertaken; but this is only a suggestive study and so this is not a major defect. Superior research is evidenced in his notes; the bibliography in and of itself is a substantial contribution. And best of it, it is quite a readable book for the general public, as well as specialists in the field.
|
|
|
