|
How Doctors Think | 
 enlarge | Author: Jerome Groopman
Publisher: Mariner Books
Category: Book
List Price: $15.95
Buy New: $2.33
You Save: $13.62 (85%)
New (68) Used (42) from $0.80
Rating:  160 reviews
Sales Rank: 974
Media: Paperback
Edition: 1
Pages: 336
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 8.2 x 5.5 x 0.7
ISBN: 0547053649
Dewey Decimal Number: 610
EAN: 9780547053646
ASIN: 0547053649
Publication Date: March 12, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: BRAND NEW - I SHIP FAST - Please choose Expedited Shipping for Faster Delivery -
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
How Doctors Think is a window into the mind of the physician and an insightful examination of the all-important relationship between doctors and their patients. In this myth-shattering work, Jerome Groopman explores the forces and thought processes behind the decisions doctors make. He pinpints why doctors succeed and why they err. Most important, Groopman shows when and how doctors can -- with our help -- avoid snap judgments, embrace uncertainty, communicate effectively, and deploy other skills that can profoundly impact our health.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 155 more reviews...
 Without risking failure there is zero chance of success October 26, 2008
Linda Bulger (Avon, Maine)
4 out of 5 found this review helpful
br /When Dr. Jerome Groopman began his medical internship at the Massachusetts General Hospital, he placed a high priority on facts. While in medical school he had tirelessly tried to "store an encyclopedia in [his] mind" as so that when faced with patients, he could "open the mental book and find the correct diagnosis and treatment." Thirty years later he saw students and residents relying on statistics, algorithms, "evidence-based" guidelines -- tools he feared would shackle their cognitive processes. How do doctors think, he wondered? How SHOULD they think? br / br /This book is the product of his thoughtful consideration of those questions. He read the available research and spoke with many colleagues about their theory and experience, assembling cases to illustrate his findings. There are many ways a doctor can fall into errors of cognitive process. Representativeness error matches the patient against a prototype and fails to consider other possibilities: a fit, active man is probably not having a heart attack. Attribution error leads a doctor to categorize the patient negatively: the disheveled patient with edema and an enlarged liver is probably an alcoholic. Affective error prevents the doctor from looking beyond favorable indicators for a liked or admired patient. These and other errors are based in social assumptions and pattern recognition, and in the general rule that when you hear hoofbeats, you should think of horses, not zebras. In these days of managed medicine, there is bias toward a linear approach and "satisfaction of search" -- settling for the first answer that reasonably accommodates the available data. br / br /The detailing of these and other cognitive errors and shortcuts actually forms a small part of How Doctors Think. Dr. Groopman goes on to discuss situations where errors of thinking are likely to occur: the reading of X-rays and CT scans, the impact of marketing on medical decision making, the roles of variability and uncertainty in treating babies with malformed hearts, the treatment of cancer. The patients and their stories are well integrated with Dr. Groopman's discussion of his subject: how to partner with the patient for the best possible outcome. br / br /This is not a book of medical horror stories, nor of doctor-bashing; not even of managed care-bashing. It's a measured exploration of the doctor's role, with a final chapter offering advice to patients on questions they might ask their doctors. Required reading for all parties in the health care team. Yes, that means you! br / br /Linda Bulger, 2008 br /
A Patient and Doctor MUST READ October 21, 2008
Kathleen San Martino (New Jersey)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Dr. Groopman really delves into how doctors come to certain conclusions about a patient's diagnosis. He reviews various case studies and interviews various doctors to clearly drive the message that doctors need to think differently and patients need to ask questions that will enable doctors to think differently. He also mentions some questions that patients can ask to get a doctor to channel his or her thinking elsewhere. I highly recommend both patients and doctors read this book. br / br /This subject is very dear to my heart because I spent over four years being misdiagnosed until I found a doctor who discovered the problem. Once discovered, my insurance company refused to pay for an operation I needed because they felt I was new to this "diagnosing" doctor and he hadn't tried enough drugs to cure me even when many of the other doctors had prescribed the same or similar drugs in the past without any results. I had taken my case to the Independent Physicians Review Board (IPRO) which is at the state level and the last resort for HMO rulings to be overturned. They even ruled against the operation and said I needed to try more drugs. What was interesting was that the operation was also suppose to fix a structural defect in addition to everything else. Since when are structural defects cured by drugs? I called IPRO on this and got the response (after several weeks) that they didn't know that was a problem. br / br /I hope Dr. Groopman writes a sequel to this book on how insurance companies perpetuate the suffering related to how doctors are thinking. In essence insurance companies are also "diagnosing" problems incorrectly without ever seeing the patient by disagreeing with a doctor's conclusion (via paperwork) and what the doctor's recommended treatment should be. br / br /I recommend you take charge of your health care and learn the pitfalls doctors and patients fall into. What an excellent book in my opinion.
Excellent for doctors and patients October 3, 2008
Lya Auslaender (Haifa Israel)
As an MD and ocxcasional patient, I think this book is a must for all of us. I gave it out as a present to my MD friends, to my private physician and to a cousin who is a very knowledgeable RN. This book is written with modesty, humor and empathy, things which some of us lack. I am not sure that all lay people will get the gist of it, but I recommend it highly.
 Learning to Think Straight September 19, 2008
Lothe
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
When we're sick, we want to believe the doctor knows best. With authority and confidence, they assess our symptoms and assign a course of treatment, and we go along, perhaps anxiously but comforted by their wisdom just the same. br / br /In "How Doctors Think," Jerome Groopman (himself an oncologist for decades) reveals how rarely doctors are totally sure of their diagnoses--and how when they are, it may be the biggest problem of all. Doctors, like all of us, are prone to thinking errors; for example, they may jump to the most obvious conclusion, or stop thinking when they find "the answer," or any number of other common pitfalls. But when doctors stop thinking, it can result in harm to the patient. Groopman's book explores how and why these mistakes happen, and the consequences they can have. br / br /Luckily, it's not all bad news: far from trying to cast aspersions on the reliability of the medical profession, Groopman firmly believes that doctors can not only train themselves to avoid thinking errors, patients can help them by asking pointed questions during an exam or follow-up. (Groopman touches on such questions throughout, then summarizes them in a brief epilogue.) br / br /Groopman is undoubtedly a doctor before he is a writer, but his style is good-natured, and a wealth of real-life examples makes his sometimes abstract subject matter engaging. "How Doctors Think" is a sometimes surprising, sometimes disturbing, but ultimately optimistic discussion of the ongoing art form that is modern medicine. br / br /~
 it is OK September 19, 2008
Katie (USA)
2 out of 5 found this review helpful
this book review is mostly about me and not about the book's contents, but it is about doctors. br / br /I have gotten some feedback recently, over the last year, implying that I have a tendency to blame doctors for my problems. and I thought about it and I have to admit that is true. br / br /I have various disabilities and etc. my issue in particular is that due to a cognitive impairment, I go through a process of mental churning when I think through things. it is a feeling of dizziness and pressure in my head. and in the past I have fought that in a way that has negatively impacted other people, in this case, doctors. I do feel bad about that and I understand that I will need to be extremely careful. br / br /my husband is the most fair judge of this and he said that I tend to assume I won't be listened to and then panic. and for example, when I was in the hospital, he said that I continued a conversation he and I were having instead of talking to the doctor. br / br /and I thought about it and I have to admit that is true. I do have a tendency to do that. to assume things will go badly and panic. br / br /my concern is that this book is written with the same negative type slant. br / br /after thinking about it for quite some time, I decided I needed to face my fears and so I am working on it. my fear is that doctors are uncaring and threatening. br / br /the problem is, in the many years I've had appointments, is that I have been living out that fear instead of facing it. br / br /I have to admit that I have tended to think quite a bit of other people's perspectives and that has sometimes led me to a tendency to blame them - it is not always instead of taking responsibility, but in addition to it. br / br /and that is really not OK. I am finding it has a bad effect on people, including the doctors I have been seeing in some cases. :( br / br /the problem is I had a brain injury which means my insight and memory are compromised. the difficulty is that I tend to blame doctors in particular, to fill in the gaps of what I do not understand. br / br /I did think about this feedback I received. sometimes I don't think in time to avoid saying stupid things. but I did think about it, b/c it let me know that something is wrong. br / br /it can take me 5 or 6 solid hours of lying down and doing nothing but thinking through an issue like this to get to a conclusion. I believe the moral is that I need to think before I speak, or type. :) br / br /I hope that this way, my fear and anxiety will be less. br / br /I had a doctor's appointment today. I was really nervous but it went very well. I had a lot of fear and the doctor, who was my allergist, was patient and understanding.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
